methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration of many question cards around one challenge
Facilitation
Question Burst
Paper mind map with a central course onboarding question, colored main branches, keywords and cross-links.
Facilitation
Mind Mapping
Paper illustration of a Concept Map with concepts and labelled links
Knowledge Modeling
Concept Mapping
Purposedifferent
When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.When a problem gets covered up too quickly with answers, Question Burst puts the better question at the center. The format opens the thinking space before the group commits to an interpretation.When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early.Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
5-15 min15-30 min15-45 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
3-202-81-101-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Ranked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistQuestion List, Reframed Challenge, Learning PromptsMind Map, Topic Clusters, Open QuestionsConcept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
QuestionsReframingFacilitationSensemaking
BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation
KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking
Add more methods