View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 10-20 min je Frage | 20-60 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 6-50 | 1 | 5-30 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | LearningDialogueFacilitation | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment |