View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Knowledge Modeling Knowledge Mapping |  Delivery Cost of Delay |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 1-3 h | 90-180 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 3-12 | 3-8 | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer Plan | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | KnowledgeMappingRisk | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking |