View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Operations Ivy Lee Method |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Operations Eat the Frog |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | With a restless workday full of too many open items, the method creates radical simplicity. It directs attention to a short sequence instead of a broad, still-open field. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 5-10 min daily | 60-120 min | 15-90 min daily |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 1 | 5-12 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Daily Priority List, Completion Notes | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Priority Task, Completion Note, Daily Focus |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | PrioritizationProductivityExecution | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution |