View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Growth Funnel Analysis |  Growth A/B Testing |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 1-3 h | 1-4 Wochen | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 1-5 | 1-6 | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | AnalyticsConversionGrowth | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion |