methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for Flywheel.
Growth
Flywheel
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
Purposedifferent
When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.Growth often breaks down where a reinforcing mechanism builds up too much friction. A Flywheel shows the cycle of value, repetition, and reinforcement meant to sustain growth.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
5-15 min60-120 min60-120 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
3-203-85-121-5
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Ranked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistFlywheel Map, Friction Points, Growth Levers, Experiment BacklogRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PriorityFunnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
GrowthRetentionConversion
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
Add more methods