methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Purposedifferent
When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
5-15 min1-2 Tage30-60 min je Interview1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
3-2010-305-10 Interviews5-30
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Ranked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsSolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
Add more methods