View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Facilitation Decision Jam |  Innovation Contradiction Analysis |  Delivery Cost of Delay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 60-90 min | 60-120 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 4-10 | 2-8 | 3-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision |