View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Operations Barrier Analysis |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Operations MORT Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | For a safety-relevant event or a system with high protection requirements, the method examines where controls failed. It exposes both technical and organizational gaps. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 2-4 h | 1-3 h | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 2-6 | 5-30 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Barrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | MORT Worksheets, Findings per Branch, Corrective Actions, Systemic Recommendations |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | Root causeSafetyIncident | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | Root causeSafetySystemicIncident |