View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Growth A/B Testing |  Growth Funnel Analysis |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 1-4 Wochen | 1-3 h | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 1-6 | 1-5 | 5-30 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | AnalyticsConversionGrowth | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment |