methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Domain Storytelling with its core stages and visible working result.
Knowledge Modeling
Domain Storytelling
Paper illustration for Open Space Technology.
Facilitation
Open Space Technology
Paper illustration for World Café.
Facilitation
World Café
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Purposedifferent
Domain Storytelling translates domain knowledge into a shared narrative of actors, objects, and workflows. It is especially useful when language, rules, and process understanding must be tightly connected.When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order.When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity.When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h0.5-2 Tage60-180 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-820-500+12-100+8-80
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Domain Story, Glossary Notes, Process NarrativeSession Marketplace, Proceedings, Action TopicsTable Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared QuestionsDiscussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions
Tagsno overlap
KnowledgeDomain-Driven DesignProcess
FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy
FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
Add more methods