methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Domain Storytelling with its core stages and visible working result.
Knowledge Modeling
Domain Storytelling
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Purposedifferent
Domain Storytelling translates domain knowledge into a shared narrative of actors, objects, and workflows. It is especially useful when language, rules, and process understanding must be tightly connected.IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h1-3 h1-2 Tage1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
2-82-81-41-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Domain Story, Glossary Notes, Process NarrativeIssue Map, Positions, Argument NotesArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewArgument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale
Tagsno overlap
KnowledgeDomain-Driven DesignProcess
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
SensemakingDecisionRationale
Add more methods