methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Domain Storytelling with its core stages and visible working result.
Knowledge Modeling
Domain Storytelling
Paper illustration for Contextual Inquiry.
UX Research
Contextual Inquiry
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Domain Context Map
Domain Modeling
Domain Context Map
Purposedifferent
Domain Storytelling translates domain knowledge into a shared narrative of actors, objects, and workflows. It is especially useful when language, rules, and process understanding must be tightly connected.When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When a domain model and its associated contexts need to be thought through together, it creates a shared overview. It connects the business view and organizational boundary into a readable whole.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h1-3 Wochen15-45 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
2-84-12 Beobachtungen1-33-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Domain Story, Glossary Notes, Process NarrativeField Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain PointsADR File, Decision Log, RationaleDomain Context Map, Boundary Notes, Ownership Map
Tagsno overlap
KnowledgeDomain-Driven DesignProcess
UX researchObservationContext
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Domain-Driven DesignContextBoundaries
Add more methods