View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Domain Modeling Domain Context Map |  Architecture C4 Model |  Domain Modeling Context Map |  Architecture arc42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a domain model and its associated contexts need to be thought through together, it creates a shared overview. It connects the business view and organizational boundary into a readable whole. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-4 h | 1-3 h | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-5 | 2-8 | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Domain Context Map, Boundary Notes, Ownership Map | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Context Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary Notes | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View |
Tagsno overlap | Domain-Driven DesignContextBoundaries | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication |