methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for DMAIC.
Operations
DMAIC
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Paper illustration of MORT Analysis with its method-specific working model.
Operations
MORT Analysis
Paper illustration for Root Cause Tree Analysis
Operations
Root Cause Tree Analysis
Purposedifferent
For a process problem with fluctuating performance, the method brings analysis and improvement into a disciplined sequence. It creates a framework in which numbers, causes, and control come together.When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.For a safety-relevant event or a system with high protection requirements, the method examines where controls failed. It exposes both technical and organizational gaps.For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumHighMedium
Timedifferent
2-12 Wochen1-3 hMehrere Tage bis Wochen1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
3-101-82-62-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Project Charter, Measurement Plan, Cause Analysis, Control PlanArgument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision RationaleMORT Worksheets, Findings per Branch, Corrective Actions, Systemic RecommendationsCause Tree, Evidence Notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
Continuous improvementQualityProcess improvement
SensemakingDecisionRationale
Root causeSafetySystemicIncident
Root causeTreeIncidentQuality
Add more methods