View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Systems Thinking System Dynamics Simulation |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Systems Thinking Wardley Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | Wardley Mapping makes visible where an offering stands today and where it can evolve. The method connects user need, value chain, and evolution stages into a strategic basis for platform, build, or buy decisions. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 45-90 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron | 2-8 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Simulation Model, Scenario Reports | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Wardley Map, Strategic Options, Evolution Notes |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | StrategySystems thinkingDynamics |