View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 60-90 min | 45-90 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-6 | 3-12 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | ChangeDecisionStrategy | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility |