methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Paper illustration of a six-field PESTLE grid
Business Strategy
PESTLE Analysis
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Purposedifferent
DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.PESTLE Analysis makes political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental influences visible. The environment of an initiative is thereby read systematically instead of through isolated trends.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
1-2 h1-3 h1-4 Wochen45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-82-106-30 Experten3-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning reportPESTLE Map, External Risks, Strategic QuestionsExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption NotesForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes
Tags1 shared
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
StrategyMarketAnalysis
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
ChangeDecisionStrategy
Add more methods