View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Business Strategy McKinsey 7S |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 2-4 h | 90-180 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-12 | 4-12 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | 7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change Actions | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | ChangeDecisionStrategy |