View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Agile Mad Sad Glad | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 30-60 min | 1-4 Wochen | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | 6-30 Experten | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Emotion Board, Themes, Action Items | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | RetrospectiveTeamReflection | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |



