View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy DIBB |  UX Design Lean UX Canvas |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  Decision Making Delphi Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | The Lean UX Canvas helps clarify user behavior, touchpoints, and concept decisions. It makes assumptions and desired outcomes visible and captures the result as a completed canvas, hypothesis list, and first experiment. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 2-3 h | 60-120 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-8 | 3-6 | 6-30 Experten |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Completed Lean UX Canvas, Hypothesis list, First experiment | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | CanvasHypothesisOutcomesDiscovery | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy |