View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() UX Research Customer Journey Mapping | ![]() Decision Making Assumption Surfacing | ![]() UX Design Customer Journey Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When a journey needs to be understood across several phases, it arranges experience, touchpoints, and opportunities into one picture. It makes gaps and friction along the user path clear. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 2-4 h | 45-90 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 4-10 | 2-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Customer Journey Canvas, Pain Points, Experience Opportunities |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | JourneyServiceService design | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | JourneyCustomerService designCanvas |



