methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Purposedifferent
DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 hWochen bis Monate je Goal20–45 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-83-10Small cross-functional group3-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning reportGoals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options
Tagsno overlap
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
Add more methods