View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Innovation Design Charrette |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |  Innovation Starbursting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 45-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 10-50 | 3-12 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | ChangeDecisionStrategy | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery |