View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Decision Making Decision Framing Workshop | ![]() Facilitation Power Interest Grid | ![]() Decision Making Option Framing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 60-120 min | 30-60 min | 45-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 4-10 | 2-8 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Decision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence Plan | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Option Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison |



