View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Decision Making Constraint Analysis | ![]() Decision Making Option Framing | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When an initiative stalls, the limit often lies not in the idea but in hard or soft boundary conditions. Constraint Analysis separates these limits and shows which of them can actually be shaped. | In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 30-90 min | 45-120 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-8 | 3-8 | 6-30 Experten |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Constraint List, Hard/Soft Classification, Option Impact Notes, Decision Boundaries | Option Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | ConstraintsDecisionPlanningOptions | OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy |



