View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Architecture C4 Model | ![]() Business Strategy Value Chain Analysis | ![]() Architecture arc42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | Value Chain Analysis shows where value is created, costs accrue, and differentiation becomes possible along the process. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and courses of action. The result is captured as a value-chain map and lever list. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-4 h | Half day | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-5 | 3-8 | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Value Chain Map, Lever List | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | StrategyBusiness modelDiagnosisAnalysis | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication |



