View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Architecture arc42 |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-2 Tage | 45-90 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-4 | 3-12 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | ChangeDecisionStrategy | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |