View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Architecture arc42 | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-2 Tage | 1-4 Wochen | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-4 | 6-30 Experten | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Async |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |



