methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration for Contradiction Analysis.
Innovation
Contradiction Analysis
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Purposedifferent
DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 h1-2 h60-120 min60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-84-122-84-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning reportAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsContradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept IdeasProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment
Tagsno overlap
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
Add more methods