methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Diary Study.
UX Research
Diary Study
Paper illustration for Wizard of Oz Test
Product Discovery
Wizard of Oz Test
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Paper illustration of a participant using a prototype while an observer takes notes beside a highlighted usability issue.
UX Research
Usability Testing
Purposedifferent
When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory.When a new experience would still be too expensive to automate for real, it simulates the outcome behind the scenes. It checks user reaction and value before the technology disappears.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen2-10 Tage30-60 min je Interview1-2 h je Session
Participantsdifferent
5-205-20 Nutzer5-10 InterviewsBased on research question
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience TimelinePrototype Learnings, Manual Effort Notes, Risk ListSolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesUsability Issues, Severity List, Recommendations
Tagsno overlap
UX researchTrackingBehavior
PrototypeValidationMVP
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
ValidationUXPrototype
Add more methods