methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Diary Study.
UX Research
Diary Study
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Purposedifferent
When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen30-60 min je Interview1-2 Tage30-60 min je Interview
Participantsdifferent
5-205-10 InterviewsBased on research question5-12 Interviews
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience TimelineSolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments
Tagsno overlap
UX researchTrackingBehavior
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
Information architectureNavigationFindability
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
Add more methods