methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Diary Study.
UX Research
Diary Study
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration of Competency Questions with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
Competency Questions
Paper illustration of a calm four-quadrant Assumption Map with hypothesis cards and emphasis on important assumptions with little evidence.
Product Discovery
Assumption Mapping
Purposedifferent
When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures.When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen1-5 Tage2-4 h45-60 min
Participantsdifferent
5-20Nutzertraffic2-82-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience TimelineInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteCompetency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage MatrixAssumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking
Tagsno overlap
UX researchTrackingBehavior
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic
AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation
Add more methods