methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Diary Study.
UX Research
Diary Study
Paper illustration of a scoring table with four factor columns, a calculator and three ordered initiative cards.
Product Strategy
RICE Scoring
A paper-based illustration representing Context Canvas with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Context Canvas
Paper illustration for Contextual Inquiry.
UX Research
Contextual Inquiry
Purposedifferent
When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory.When many initiatives compete for the same resources, it brings reach, impact, confidence, and effort into one shared ranking. It makes prioritization economically connectable.When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency.When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen60-90 min45-90 min1-3 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
5-202-103-104-12 Beobachtungen
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience TimelineRICE Scores, Ranked List, Assumption LogContext canvas, Open questions, Shared context notesField Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points
Tagsno overlap
UX researchTrackingBehavior
PrioritizationScoringRoadmapTradeoffs
ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas
UX researchObservationContext
Add more methods