methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Diary Study.
UX Research
Diary Study
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Purposedifferent
When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen60-120 min30 min Setup, dann laufend5-15 min
Participantsdifferent
5-205-121-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone3-20
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience TimelineRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PriorityRAID Log, Status Report SourceRanked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist
Tagsno overlap
UX researchTrackingBehavior
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
Add more methods