View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Diary Study | ![]() Facilitation Nominal Group Technique | ![]() Facilitation 1-2-4-All | ![]() Facilitation Dot Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 60-120 min | 10-20 min | 5-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-20 | 5-12 | 4-100+ | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience Timeline | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchTrackingBehavior | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization |



