methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Diary Study.
UX Research
Diary Study
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Purposedifferent
When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen120 min initial, dann laufend1-2 Tage90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
5-203-6Based on research question3-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience TimelineHEART-GSM Table, DashboardFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAGQM Table, Metric Profiles
Tagsno overlap
UX researchTrackingBehavior
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
Information architectureNavigationFindability
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
Add more methods