View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Diary Study | ![]() Decision Making Argument Mapping | ![]() Systems Thinking Rich Picture | ![]() Knowledge Modeling IBIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | A Rich Picture brings an unclear situation onto a shared drawing. It captures actors, tensions, information flows, and blind spots before the team jumps to solutions too early. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 1-3 h | 30-90 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-20 | 1-8 | 2-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience Timeline | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Rich Picture, Problem Framing Notes | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchTrackingBehavior | SensemakingDecisionRationale | Systems thinkingSoft systemsFramingVisualization | RationaleKnowledgeDecision |



