View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Design Thinking |  Architecture Views and Beyond |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Innovation Design Sprint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. | Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 1-3 Tage | 15-45 min | 4-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 5-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings | Architecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | InnovationPrototypeResearch | DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation |