View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Design Thinking |  Agile ROAM Board |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 4-5 Tage | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 3-15 | 5-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings | ROAM Board, Owner List | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | InnovationPrototypeResearch | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |