View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Innovation Design Thinking | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 90-180 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 4-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | RAID Log, Status Report Source | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | InnovationPrototypeResearch | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |



