View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Design Design Studio |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several designs need to be quickly put in relation to each other, it makes ideas visible and comparable. It encourages early variants instead of long upfront debates. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 3-15 | 3-12 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Sketches, Concept Directions, Design Decisions | ROAM Board, Owner List | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tagsno overlap | SketchingCollaborationIdeation | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | TeamCollaborationAgile |