View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Design Design Studio |  Agile Planning Poker |  Innovation Design Charrette |  Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several designs need to be quickly put in relation to each other, it makes ideas visible and comparable. It encourages early variants instead of long upfront debates. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 2-5 min je Item | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 3-9 | 10-50 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Sketches, Concept Directions, Design Decisions | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tagsno overlap | SketchingCollaborationIdeation | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | TeamCollaborationAgile |