View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Design Design Studio |  Agile Example Mapping |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Agile Three Amigos |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several designs need to be quickly put in relation to each other, it makes ideas visible and comparable. It encourages early variants instead of long upfront debates. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 30-60 min | 10-20 min | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 3-7 | 4-100+ | 3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Sketches, Concept Directions, Design Decisions | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | SketchingCollaborationIdeation | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement |