View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Design Design Studio | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Architecture arc42 | ![]() Innovation Design Charrette |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several designs need to be quickly put in relation to each other, it makes ideas visible and comparable. It encourages early variants instead of long upfront debates. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 15-45 min | 1-2 Tage | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 10-50 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Sketches, Concept Directions, Design Decisions | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction |
Tagsno overlap | SketchingCollaborationIdeation | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation |



