View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Architecture Risk Storming |  Architecture Quality Attribute Workshop |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | A Quality Attribute Workshop translates quality requirements into concrete scenarios and architecture impulses. The method brings product, engineering, and operations to the same view of desired properties. | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 4-5 Tage | 60-90 min | 2-4 h | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 5-8 | 4-12 | 5-15 | 5-10 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Quality Scenarios, Priority List, Architecture Concerns | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes |
Tagsno overlap | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | RequirementsArchitectureWorkshop | ValidationInterviewsPrototype |