methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Design Sprint with its core stages and visible working result.
Innovation
Design Sprint
Paper illustration of Lean Startup with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Lean Startup
Paper illustration: scenarios and architectural decisions are connected to identified risks.
Architecture
ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method)
Paper illustration of Five-Minute VC Check with its method-specific working model.
Business Strategy
5-Minuten VC-Check
Purposedifferent
When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess.For uncertain business assumptions, the method forces the idea into contact with real market reactions early. It separates wishful picture, assumption, and observable behavior, so that learning becomes faster than planning. This translates uncertainty into measurable insight.ATAM helps teams weigh architecture decisions when quality goals compete. The team considers business goals, stakeholder expectations, and technical decisions together. The evaluation shows which risks need further investigation.The 5-Minute VC Check clarifies opportunities and strategic options at the earliest idea stage. It compares problem quality, customer willingness to pay, alternatives, differentiation, and market potential, and captures the result as a VC-check note, go/sharpen/park decision, and risk list.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
4-5 TageWochen bis Monate je LernzyklusSeveral meetings plus preparation and analysis; total effort depends on scope5-15 min
Participantsdifferent
5-82-8Evaluation team, architects, and relevant stakeholders1-5
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Prototype, Test Findings, Decision RationaleHypothesis list, MVPs, Learning reports, Pivot or persevere decisionPrioritized quality scenarios in a utility tree, Architecture risks with reasoning and assumptions, Sensitivity and trade-off points, Findings report with open investigationsVC-check note, Go/sharpen/park decision, Risk and assumption list, Next validation step
Tagsno overlap
Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation
LeanStartupValidationMVP
ArchitectureQualityRiskTradeoffsStakeholders
StartupValidationCompetition
Add more methods