View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree |  Innovation Design Thinking |  Systems Thinking Iceberg Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. | The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 4-5 Tage | 2-6 h | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-8 | 3-8 | 4-10 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings | Iceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality | InnovationPrototypeResearch | Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns |