View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Architecture C4 Model |  Innovation Design Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 4-5 Tage | 15-45 min | 1-4 h | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 5-8 | 1-3 | 1-5 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings |
Tagsno overlap | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | InnovationPrototypeResearch |