View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Innovation Design Charrette | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping | ![]() Innovation Starbursting | ![]() UX Design Design Studio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. | When several designs need to be quickly put in relation to each other, it makes ideas visible and comparable. It encourages early variants instead of long upfront debates. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 1-2 h | 30-60 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 1-8 | 3-10 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List | Sketches, Concept Directions, Design Decisions |
Tagsno overlap | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery | SketchingCollaborationIdeation |



